requestId:68499ac31bd6f7.96121303.
WeChat Discussion on Xunzi’s “Sexual Tales” (II)
Baocai SoftwareAuthor: Lin Guizhen, Li Jian, Liao Xiaoying, Liu Sihe, etc.
Source: Author Author Authorization Confucian Network Release
Time: Confucius was in the 2570s and was the first day of the month of Jihai Pu. Xinwei
Roman”;}@font-face{font-family:”Song-body”;}@font-face{font-family:”Calibri”;}p.MsoNormal{mso-style-name:Note;mso-style-parent:””;margin:0pt;margin-bottom:.0001pt;mso-pagination:none;text-align:justify;text-justify:inter-ideograph;font-family:Calibri;mso-fareast-font-family:’Times New Roman’;font-size:10.5000pt;mso-font-kerning:1.0000pt;}span.msoIns{mso-style-type:export-only;mso-style-name:””;text-decoration:underline;text-underline:single;color:blue;}span.msoDel{mso-style-type:export-only;mso-style-name:””;text-decoration:line-through;color:red;}@page{mso-page-border-surround-header:no;mso-page-border-surround-footer:no;}@page Section0{margin-top:72.0000pt;margin-bottoBaobao.comm:72.0000pt;margin-left:90.0000pt;margin-right:90.0000pt;size:595.3000pt 841.9000pt;layout-grid:15.6000pt;}div.Section0{page:Section0;}
【Lin Guizhen】@Yuan Xue (Li Jian) The nature is humanely separated, and the sexual habits and sexual evil are not in conflict. The nature of humanity is not separated, and the nature itself is evil. From these two situations, Xunzi is not in conflict. Can Xunzi’s original text eliminate these two explanations? ——Answer: What is sexual aversion, what is evil and goodness, what is talent and what is material and nature. The text of Xun’s book has a definition or a discussion. As for whether the type of “simple-scrupulous-scrupulousness官网-bad-scrupulousness” can be inconsistent or in harmony, Teacher Li Jian can read the original text of Xun’s book and summarize it himself. If you break the detailed chapters and sentences of Xun’s book and borrow a certain concept from Xun’s book, it is called “spoken topics” but may not be “spotted”.
【Lin Guizhen】@Dr. Yuanxue (Li Jian) Can Dr. Lin’s article eliminate two situations? One way to be vicious is to be vicious, just like a 3-year-old child steals a cucumber when he sees it. The foul here is vicious. One way is that the essence refers to the nature, the evil refers to the human way, and the heaven and man are both different. Or the article can respond carefully to these two types. ——Answer: The most elegant and elegant articles of other people’s comments and Xun’s original texts are discussed again. Don’t rush to “concise” and establish other people’s comments. to consolidate the software According to this self-adjustment, Mencius and Xun have been unified, and there is no gap in the cost of holes, and it is not as good as the word “nature is bad” that never accepts Xun’s comments that “nature is good (nature is good based on material, ethics is good)”! As far as text is concerned, in Xun’s book, “peace” refers to the original state of material (quality beauty, evil, ethics, goodness, evil), “evil” refers to social contradictory (biased against the order of righteous society), “nature” refers to natural material nature (human nature is born according to material, and the “nature” of material people has desires, knows, and can distinguish (the result or evil of human desire ≠ the result must be evil, and the result is evil ≠ the desire to be evil, and even more ≠ the nature of evil ). The so-called phenomenon of a child stealing melons is based on Xun’s book that behavior (action) is not nature (nature) is not bad, nor is it bad for the person who is good for the person who is good for the person who is good for the person who is good for the person who is good for the person who is good for the person who is good for the person who is good for the person who is good for the person who is good for the person who is good for the person who is good for the person who is good for the person who is good for the person who is good for the person who is good for the person who is good for the person who is good for the person who is good for the person who is good for the person who is good for the person who is good for the person who is good for the person who is good for the person who is good for the person who is good for the person who is good for the person who is good for the person who is good for the person who is good for the person who is good for the person who is good for the person who is good for the person who is good for the person who is good for the person who is good for the person who is good for the person who is good for the person who is not able to refute the person who is good for the person who is good for the person who is good for the person who is good for the person who is good for the person who is not able to think of it! As for the so-called “nature-humanity” problem, the nature of heaven and human nature are two different things, and it is not mixed. Xunzi retorted that “the separation between heaven and man” is still not visible! What you call “nature-humanity” is the same thing if it refers to the humanity of nature and the natural nature of human beings; the concept of “nature” now refers to the natural nature of animals, including MengBaobao.com‘s cow nature and nature, haha.
[Lin Guizhen] Teacher Li, teacher, read the article again and again, has a discussion of Xun Wen based on or citing the original text. You say, “When you are straight, human nature is bad,” “When you are straight, human nature is the beginning,” “When you are straight, human nature is the essence of human nature”, the perceptual efficiency of human beings is the nature of nature is not the emotion (Sexuality is emotion, emotion expresses desire)? It is a long way to generate sensory needs and often produce evil (Xunzi used this to make Mencius’s nature good argument that it is not true), but it may not necessarily result in complete evil and evil (see the definition and source of Xun’s book “nature”). It is like a beautiful school and beauty are also the “desire fruit” of beauty… Sex is a concise, and nature is evil. Strictly reconcile the two together and define according to the concept of Xun’s book Analyzing the practice language logic, it is more common to talk nonsense when Mencius and Gaozi and others about nature good discussions.
[Lin Guizhen] The common understanding of Xun’s book is: The chapter “Nature evil” refutes the saying that people have desires and leads to social troubles, and closely follows the discussion “Nature evil-goodness” to establish the core of Xun’s book’s “Nature evil” discussion. This is like this in the original text of Xun’s book. But after Xun’s “nature style” discussion““, those who read Xun’s writing articles immediately jumped and changed to the “nature style-nature” discussion. They said that material nature is simple but the demand is bad, or they are not stupid. If they are not stupid, they are bad, or they are calm and simple but move down to bad, so the two questions and principles of “nature style-nature style”平台生台生女台生台生女台生女台生女台生女台生女台生女台生女台生女台生女台生女台生女台生女台生女台生女台生女台生女台生女台生女台生女台生女台生女台生女台生女台生女台生女台生女台生女台生女台生女台生女台生女台生女台生女台生女台生女台生女台生女台生女台生女台生女台生女台生女台生女台生女台生女台生女台生女台生女台生女台生女台生女� There is a constitution), maintaining good nature means that the nature of nature is pure and pure (benevolence, righteousness, wisdom, etc.). Xunzi made Mencius discuss humanity and made a statement about nature evil and added a statement about nature (the “bad-bending” in nature is mixed), but it can be seen that Xunzi is not as good as Mencius. He is completely scattered, with mixed concepts, mixed fates, and straightforward discourses. It is a destruction.
[Lin Guizhen] Mencius From the purely evil theory of human nature in “Heavenly Realm”, Gaozi’s “human nature” is not evil theory, Xunzi’s “meat world” is not evil theory (or is evil theory of human nature?), and Mencius’s “heavenly Realm” is not evil theory of human nature. In general, they all say it, differ from each other, even if you survive and I die, and if you are not two, they are not two. However, in Mencius’s heart, the heavenly human nature is in heaven, so the masters and men are good at nature can be understood by themselves; in Xunzi’s heart, the heavenly human nature is divided into nature, so ordinary people Xunzi is not good at discussing (or is a slander?) and has a way to understand. In a word, big philosophers have big philosophers’ thinking system, big philosophers have big philosophers’ learning path. Mencius who is spiritually connected to heaven and Xunzi who is staring at people have different opinions on heaven and man, but they are both so profound and lovely and respectable. Kang Youwei said in Wanmu Caotang that Confucius, Mencius and Xunzi are like the Buddha’s horse veals and dragon
發佈留言