requestId:684c3e4d07a104.90391883.
He Jun: Talk about Confucianism in Jiangnan
Interviewer: He Jun
Interviewer: Huang Xiaofeng (Peng Pai News reporter)
Source: Peng Pai News
Time: Confucius was in his 2571 year of Xinchou April 12th Xinwei
� src=”https://static.rujiazg.com/storage/article/752.jpg!article_800_auto”>
He Jun, the image of Zhang Jingyu, was taught by the School of Philosophy of the Dark School of Philosophy of the Dark School of Philosophy of the Dandan, was a researcher of Chinese philosophy and thought history. He has published works such as “The Disintegration of Western and Late Ming Thoughts”, “The Construction of Confucianism in the Southern Song Dynasty”, “Things and Hearts: The Energy Dimension of Zhejiang”, etc., which has been transformed into the river in recent years. href=”https://twsweetmeet.com/”>Baoqing Love WomenStudy on Southern Confucianism. Jiangnan Confucianism is not a concept that has been established in history. Song Wei, who proposed this concept, began to fill out the form. What are the basis for fact and theory? When receiving the interview with “Shanghai Book Review”, He Jun believed that the inherent characteristics of Confucianism in Jiangnan are for the future, not just to think about the ancient feelings, but more importantly, to master their energy and fight from the historical Chen.
Peng Pai News:You proposed the concept of Jiangnan Confucianism earlier, which touches on the problem defined by Jiangnan Confucianism. We usually talk about the economy and civilization of Jiangnan. It was only when China came to the Wei Dynasty and the Southern and Northern Dynasties that Jiangnan began to emigrate and develop in large scale. The development of economic civilization in Jiangnan was a long-term process. Will there be a later insight, that is, the economic civilization in Jiangnan has been developed, and I feel that there is a need to raise the problem of Confucianism in Jiangnan?
He Jun: First of all, I need to correct it. The concept of Confucianism in Jiangnan cannot be considered as what I proposed. When the Shanghai Confucian Academy was established, the mission plan was determined. One of the intentions was to conduct research and discussions in the Jiangnan Confucian field, which is the key task of the Shanghai Confucian Academy. However, colleagues at the Shanghai Confucian Academy have their own heavy teaching and research tasks, so after this concept was proposed, it was not materially activated. After I left Zhejiang in 2018 and went to the Jodan position, Sun, the president of the School of Philosophy, taught Chen that I hope I can build this field, and that Jiangnan Confucianism was also proposed by him. I was indeed a little doubtful at that time, just like what you said, and now those who are studying Confucianism seem to be constantly mentioning various Confucian oral terms, such as political Confucianism, mental Confucianism, and career Confucianism. Now I suddenly mentioned another question about Confucianism in Jiangnan. Is it unnecessary?? I have studied Song and Ming Technological Studies for a long time, and also focused on regional Confucianism. The important thing is to study Zhejiang. There are originally Zhejiang East School in history, and there are also some that are simply called Zhejiang School. After the transformation and opening up, the Zhejiang academic community raised the problem of Zhejiang very high. All provinces also have this situation, that is, to use the current administrative area as a means to explore its own historical civilization. A metaphor for saying that Anhui naturally has Anhui, or it may be called Hui. Jiangsu does not seem to have clearly called Su, but there is Wu, Changzhou school and Yangzhou school; Jiangxi had Jiangyou school and Xun school in the Ming Dynasty; Hunan had Hunan school; Guanxi had related studies; Henan had Luo school, which were all names that were already known in history. Now when I mention Jiangnan Confucianism, how can I understand this problem?
Later, I also sorted out this aspect. I think this is a task and can be verified from the meaning of academics. My first step was to write a relatively long article published in the “Revival Journal” to discuss the proposal, purpose and segmentation of Confucianism in Jiangnan. I want to do a basic task for future Jiangnan Confucianism research. At the same time, starting from 2018, three academic seminars on the topic of Jiangnan Confucianism were held, and that time in 2019 was international. My colleagues in the academic world also gave great support. Others, I started a series of lectures on Jiangnan Confucianism in Yudan University, which is about twenty lectures. In these academic activities, the concept of Confucianism in Jiangnan has gradually become clear in my mind, and colleagues in the academic world can also be more or less clear. Of course, I guess doubt and sympathy coexist.
The development of Jiangnan usually started with the southern transition of Yongjia. From the current archaeological discoveries, Chinese civilization is a state of diversified occurrence. For example, the Liangzhu civilization in Zhejiang and the Sanxingdui in Sichuan, these are all very classic and difficult to explain with a single Huanghe civilization. During his old age, Wu Yue was found in Jiangnan. It was hard to say that Jiangnan did not participate in the civilization process of Huaxia. From a general perspective, the development of Jiangnan can be said to have a long history and unique characteristics. At the same time, this has also developed under the condition of sufficient acceptance of southern civilization, and has gradually become the center of Chinese economic civilization. I think this way is expressed. Jiangnan is a source of the Chinese civilized teachers’ court, but it also has its own rich characteristics. The Huanghe civilization has indeed become the mainstream of Chinese civilization later, and there is a process of spreading to the south in the historical clouds. China’s economic center is based on the western and easternThe transfer from north to south was already very prominent in the Ming Dynasty.
I used Chen Zilong’s information in my article and wanted to confess this. Chen Zilong wanted to prove the meaning of Jiangnan for the country. However, Chen Zilong’s certificate can also be asked in response, why did he write these articles? Writing these articles is to express Jiangnan’s unrecognized experience. In fact, Jiangnan has given great contributions to the entire Ming Dynasty empire, but in terms of national politics, it has not received the due respect and recognition. So he had to write an article to explain this problem to the court. Therefore, it is not complete to propose Confucianism in Jiangnan, because it is indeed a historical phenomenon. At most, by emphasizing the characteristics of the North and South academics in “Southern History”, he confessed that the academics in Jiangnan were seeking a certain unique feature of themselves. Therefore, incompleteness is a future of tomorrow’s man’s insight, and it is indeed such a basic historical fact.
In addition, from the perspective of academic history, you have just talked about it. Jiangnan Research has always been in the economic field in the past. After the Anshi Faction, China’s economic center moved southward. This was doubled in the Southern Song Dynasty, Ming and Qing Dynasties. Therefore, the Jiangnan Research Institute, which takes economy as the middle, has actually become a major area for international academic research since the middle of the previous century. While conducting economic research, I gradually became a cat to society and civilization and finally calmed down and fell asleep obediently. Extend. In this way, of course, one will raise a major problem. We have to admit that behind economy, society, and civilization, there is something more powerful and powerlessly extended, which should be science and thinking.
It is difficult for us to say that a region has increasingly developed economy, more and more diverse social forms, and more and more civilized faces, but we only have no academic and thought behind it. It’s just that this task has been neglected for a long time. Negligence does not mean that no one has discussed academic thinking within the region, but that it does not have enough academic thinking about the overall nature of Jiangnan. The academic thinking that is discussed here that corresponds to the Jiangnan study and discussion focuses on Confucianism. The Confucianism research with Jiangnan as the entire stage has not become an independent academic field. It’s not that there are any specific research within the Jiangnan area, but there are many people who are Wang Yangming. Of course, Wang Yangming was from Jiangnan in the Ming Dynasty, but when the master understood him, he did not have the meaning of Jiangnan in many years. Some people also discussed Long Zizhen and Zhang Taiyan, but how many people are experiencing Jiangnan when discussing them? In addition to the characteristics of Southern History and Northern History, people later said that in “Southern History” and “Northern History” talked about the characteristics of Southern and Northern Studies, for example, in the Northern Song Dynasty, there was still a sense of South and North. It was only just that Chen Zilong, a Ming Dynasty, also said that “there is
發佈留言